Exploring the Influence of Digital Literacy, Metacognitive Awareness, and Prior Knowledge on Critical Thinking Skills among Engineering Education Students

Hendra Hidayat(1*),

(1) Universitas Negeri Padang
(*) Corresponding Author




Abstract

In the era of rapid technological advancement, critical thinking has become a core competency in higher education, especially within engineering education. This study investigates the influence of digital literacy, metacognitive awareness, and prior knowledge on the development of critical thinking skills among engineering education students in Indonesian universities. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 455 undergraduate students through validated questionnaires. The results, analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM), reveal that all three independent variables significantly and positively influence students' critical thinking skills, with metacognitive awareness emerging as the strongest predictor. The findings highlight the importance of integrating digital competence, reflective learning, and foundational knowledge in the curriculum to foster critical thinking. This study offers theoretical and practical implications for enhancing cognitive development in higher education settings.

Keywords

Digital Literacy; Metacognitive Awareness; Prior Knowledge; Critical Thinking Skills

References

Adrianus Sihombing, A., Anugrahsari, S., Parlina, N., & Kusumastuti, Y. S. (2021). Merdeka Belajar in an Online Learning during The Covid-19 Outbreak: Concept and Implementation. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 35. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16207

Akpur, U. (2020). Critical, Reflective, Creative Thinking and Their Reflections on Academic Achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683

Alkhatib, O. J. (2019). A Framework for Implementing Higher-Order Thinking Skills (Problem-Solving, Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Decision-Making) in Engineering & Humanities. 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714232

Brod, G. (2021). Toward an understanding of when prior knowledge helps or hinders learning. Npj Science of Learning, 6(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00103-w

Bulger, M. E., Mayer, R. E., & Metzger, M. J. (2014). Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1567–1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9507-2

Coetzee, J., Neneh, B., Stemmet, K., Lamprecht, J., Motsitsi, C., & Sereeco, W. (2021). South African universities in a time of increasing disruption. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v24i1.3739

Dorjee, D. (2016). Defining Contemplative Science: The Metacognitive Self-Regulatory Capacity of the Mind, Context of Meditation Practice and Modes of Existential Awareness. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01788

Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 31–47). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_2

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313

Ghasemy, M., Teeroovengadum, V., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). This fast car can move faster: a review of PLS-SEM application in higher education research. The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 80(6), 1121–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00534-1

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4

Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 28, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.005

Kallio, H., Virta, K., & Kallio, M. (2018). Modelling the Components of Metacognitive Awareness. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.2789

Liu, T.-C., Lin, Y.-C., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of prior knowledge on learning from different compositions of representations in a mobile learning environment. Computers & Education, 72, 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.019

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in Teaching and Learning: Exploring the Perceptions of the Education Sector on the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020031

Oleson, A., & Hora, M. T. (2014). Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices. Higher Education, 68(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9678-9

Sellars, M., Fakirmohammad, R., Bui, L., Fishetti, J., Niyozov, S., Reynolds, R., Thapliyal, N., Liu-Smith, Y.-L., & Ali, N. (2018). Conversations on Critical Thinking: Can Critical Thinking Find Its Way Forward as the Skill Set and Mindset of the Century? Education Sciences, 8(4), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040205

Sulisworo, D., Drusmin, R., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Handayani, T., Wahyuningsih, W., Jufriansah, A., Khusnani, A., & Prasetyo, E. (2021). The Science Teachers’ Optimism Response to the Use of Marker-Based Augmented Reality in the Global Warming Issue. Education Research International, 2021, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7264230

Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital Literacy: A Prerequisite for Effective Learning in a Blended Learning Environment? The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 14, 54–65. www.ejel.org


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24036/00797kons2022
10.24036/00797kons2022

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 39 times
PDF : 12 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.