1. Home
  2. Vol 4, No 4 (2022)
  3. Rinaldi

Metacognitive Awareness in Students

Rinaldi Rinaldi(1*), Febriani Rahmatillah(2),

(1) Universitas Negeri Padang
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang
(*) Corresponding Author




Abstract

This study aims to measure students' metacognitive and the difference in abilities used from the metacognitive component. The research subjects were 500 Padang State University students. The research measurement tool uses the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory from Schraw and Dennison. The results showed that metacognitive awareness was in the moderate category at 36.4%. While the results of the metacognitive awareness research component of cognition knowledge in the medium category amounted to 37.6%, the component of cognition regulation in the high category was 31.6%. The results showed that metacognitive awareness based on gender was 39.08% for men, while 34.66% for women. The results showed that metacognitive awareness based on gender components of cognitive knowledge in the medium category for men was 43.10%, while women were 33.13%, components of cognition regulation in men were in the high and medium categories of 34.48%, while women in the medium category were 33.44%. There is no difference in metacognitive abilities between men and women. There is a correlation between metacognitive abilities and academic achievement.

Keywords

metacognitive; metacognitive knowledge; metacognitive regulation; student.

References

Abdellah, R. (2015). Metacognitive Awareness and its Relation to Academic Achievement and Teaching Performance of Pre-service Female Teachers in Ajman University in UAE. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.707

Alkan, F., & Erdem, E. (2014). The Relationship between Metacognitive Awareness, Teacher Self-efficacy and Chemistry Competency Perceptions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 778–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.475

Oz, H. (2016). Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Motivation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Teacher Education Context of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.035

Oz, H. (2016). The Importance of Personality Traits in StudentsPerceptions of Metacognitive Awareness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.090

Rahman, F., Jumani, N. B., Chaudry, M. A., & Abbasi, F. (2010). Impact of metacognitive awareness on performance of students in chemistry. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 03 (10)(23), 39–43.

Sarıcoban, A. (2015). Metacognitive Awareness of pre-service English Language Teachers in Terms of Various Variables. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186(2007), 664–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.135

Schleifer, L. L. F., & Dull, R. B. (2009). Accounting Classroom. Issues in Accounting Education, 24(3), 339–367.

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 103(3), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. In Contemporary Educational Psychology 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories Gregory. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.

Young & Fry. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2)(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.487711


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24036/00692kons2022
10.24036/00692kons2022

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 186 times
PDF : 129 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.