How Teacher Support Affects Students Engagement in Learning Math?

Putri Sukma Deri(1*), Surya Cahyadi(2), Erna Susiati(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Padang
(2) Universitas Padjadjaran
(3) Universitas Padjadjaran
(*) Corresponding Author




Abstract

Keterlibatan siswa dalam aktivitas belajar secara teoretis disebut dengan engagement. Banyak penelitian yang menemukan bahwa engagement ini dapat memprediksi proses belajar sampai pada hasil belajar siswa. Skinner dan Pitzer mengatakan salah satu fasilitator dari engagemet adalah hubungan interpersonal individu dengan konteks sosialnya, seperti guru. Guru dapat memengaruhi engagement siswa dengan menerapkan autonomy support, structure dan involvement kepada siswanya. Oleh karena itu, tujuan dari penelitian untuk mengetahui bagaimana dukungan guru memengaruhi behavioral engagement, khususnya pada pelajaran matematika. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 291 orang siswa MTs X Jatinangor. Pengukuran dilakukan dengan meminta penilaian siswa terhadap guru dengan alat ukur Teacher As Social Context (Short-Form) dan self-report dengan skala engegement vs disaffection with learning measure. Hasil uji regresi linear berganda menunjukkan autonomy support, involvement dan structure memiliki pengaruh signifikan secara bersama-sama dalam memprediksi behavioral engagement siswa, dengan tingkat determinansinya sebesar 21.8%. Selain itu, structure dan involvement memiliki pengaruh signifikan secara parsial terhadap behavioral engagement.

Keywords

autonomy; behavioral; engagement; involvement; structure

References

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002

Dilah, A. (2019). Pengaruh basic psychological needs terhadap engagement mahasiswa fakultas psikologi universitas padjadjaran. Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7

Hospel, Virginie & Galand, Benoit. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction. 41. 1-10. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001.

Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci. (2010). Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It Is Not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 3, 588-600. DOI: 10.1037/a0019682.

Jatnika, R. (2018). Belajar statistik dengan UNPAD SAS. UNPAD Press: Bandung.

Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Quint & Nakata, Yoshiyuki. (2015). Structure also supports autonomy: Measuring and defining autonomy-supportive teaching in Japanese elementary foreign language classes: Structure also supports autonomy. Japanese Psychological Research. 57. 10.1111/jpr.12077.

Patrick, H., Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., & Midgley, C. (2003). How Teachers Establish Psychological Environments During the First Days of School: Associations With Avoidance in Mathematics. Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1521-1558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00299

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, nomor 58 tahun 2016

Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

Reeve, H. & Cheon, .(2016). Teachers become more autonomy supportive after they believe it is easy to do. Psychology of sport and exercise, 22, 178-189.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci L, E. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation. In self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness.

Sierens, E. Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F. 2009. The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British journal of educational psychology, 79, 57—68.

Skinner, Ellen A.; Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. Handbook of Motivation at School., 223–245.

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2008). A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233

Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and Disaffection in the Classroom: Part of a Larger Motivational Dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840

Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Coping during childhood and adolescence: A motivational perspective. Life-Span Development and Behavior, 12(March), 91–133.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Suherman, Ermandkk. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student in middle school: the role of perceived pendagogical caring. Journal of educational psychology. American psychological association

Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of Achievement Motivation and Engagement. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy316


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24036/00713kons2023
10.24036/00713kons2023

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 272 times
PDF : 104 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.