How Teacher Support Affects Students Engagement in Learning Math?
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang
(2) Universitas Padjadjaran
(3) Universitas Padjadjaran
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
References
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Dilah, A. (2019). Pengaruh basic psychological needs terhadap engagement mahasiswa fakultas psikologi universitas padjadjaran. Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Hospel, Virginie & Galand, Benoit. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction. 41. 1-10. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001.
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci. (2010). Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It Is Not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 3, 588-600. DOI: 10.1037/a0019682.
Jatnika, R. (2018). Belajar statistik dengan UNPAD SAS. UNPAD Press: Bandung.
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Quint & Nakata, Yoshiyuki. (2015). Structure also supports autonomy: Measuring and defining autonomy-supportive teaching in Japanese elementary foreign language classes: Structure also supports autonomy. Japanese Psychological Research. 57. 10.1111/jpr.12077.
Patrick, H., Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., & Midgley, C. (2003). How Teachers Establish Psychological Environments During the First Days of School: Associations With Avoidance in Mathematics. Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1521-1558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00299
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, nomor 58 tahun 2016
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Reeve, H. & Cheon, .(2016). Teachers become more autonomy supportive after they believe it is easy to do. Psychology of sport and exercise, 22, 178-189.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci L, E. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation. In self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness.
Sierens, E. Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F. 2009. The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British journal of educational psychology, 79, 57—68.
Skinner, Ellen A.; Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. Handbook of Motivation at School., 223–245.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2008). A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and Disaffection in the Classroom: Part of a Larger Motivational Dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Coping during childhood and adolescence: A motivational perspective. Life-Span Development and Behavior, 12(March), 91–133.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suherman, Ermandkk. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student in middle school: the role of perceived pendagogical caring. Journal of educational psychology. American psychological association
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of Achievement Motivation and Engagement. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy316
DOI: 10.24036/00713kons2023
Article Metrics
Abstract View : 302 timesPDF : 136 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.