Truancy Behavior Student in terms of Factors Causing and Teacher's Efforts to Overcome Them

Elva Betti Idris(1*), Yarmis Syukur(2),

(1) Universitas Negeri Padang
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang
(*) Corresponding Author




Abstract

This research is motivated by the phenomenon of students who often skip class without clear information, being around the school while sitting in the canteen during class hours. This is because students are not interested in lessons and are bored in learning. This study aims to describe truancy behavior in terms of the causes and teachers' efforts to overcome it.This type of research is descriptive using quantitative methods. The population of this study was 278 students of SMPN 34 Padang who were registered in the 2019/2020 school year, with a total sample of 54 students who were truant, the sample selection used a purposive sampling technique. The data collection technique used a questionnaire with a Likert scale model. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques. This study describes the factors that cause truant students to be in the low category, and based on the indicators (1) the students' own factors are in the high enough category with a percentage (38.89%), (2) family factors are in the low category with a percentage (55, 56%), (3) school factors are in the low category with a percentage (37.04%), and community factors in the school environment are in the high enough category with a percentage (44.44%). Furthermore, the teacher's efforts to overcome truant students are in the high enough category, and based on the indicators (1) enforcing school discipline is in the very high category with a percentage (37.04%), (2) helping to overcome problems experienced by students is in the high category with a percentage (35.19%), (3) providing facilities, learning facilities and infrastructure is in the high enough category with a percentage (42.59%), and (4) establishing cooperation with various parties is in the high enough category with a percentage ( 53.70%).

Keywords

truancy behavior; causative factors; and teacher’s efforts overcome it

References

Ahmad. (2019). Pengendalian Perilaku Membolos Peserta Didik melalui Layanan Konseling Behavioristik. JCOSE Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 1(2), 21–30.

Aswida W, Marjohan, S. Y. (2012). Efektifitas Layanan Bimbingan Kelompok dalam Mengurangi Kecemasan Berkomunikasi Pada Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Konseling, 1 (1).

Aulia, K., Afrizal, S., & Syukur, Y. (2017). Permasalahan yang disampaikan Siswa Kepada Guru BK/Konselor. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(1), 45–52.

Damayanti, F. A & Setiawati, D. (2013). Studi Tentang Perilaku Membolos pada Siswa SMA Swasta di Surabaya. Jurnal BK UNESA, 3(1), 454–461.

Fitiadi, R., Nurhasanah. & Martunis. (2019). Analisis Faktor-faktor Penyebab Ketidakhadiran Siswa di Sekolah Dan Upaya Curu BK Dalam Mnegatasinya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 4(3), 8–17.

Fitriani, F. (2016). Studi Penanganan Guru BK terhadap Perilaku Membolos Siswa di SMP Kecamatan Wiyung di Surabaya. Jurnal BK UNESA.

Imron, A. (2004). Manajemen Peserta Didik Berbasis Sekolah. Malang: FIP UM.

Imron, A. (2012). Manajemen Peserta Didik Berbasis Sekolah. Malang: FIP UM.

Malik, A. (2014). Kajian tentang Perilaku Menyimpang Dikalangan Siswa: Studi Deskriptif SMA N 1 Ciamis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Nasucha, A. F. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab dan Usaha Sekolah Dalam Menanggulangi Siswa yang Membolos: Studi Kasus di SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Novarita, E. (2014). Perilaku Bolos Siswa dan Implikasinya Terhadap Layanan Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 2(2), 9–13.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 111 Tahun 2014 tentang Bimbingan dan Konseling pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Prayitno, & Erman, A. (2004). Dasar-dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Prayitno & Amti, E. (2009). Dasar-dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Putra, A. K., Firman, &Syahniar. (2019). Efektifitas Layanan Penguasaan Konten Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Bertanya Siswa. Jurnal Neo Konseling, 0(0), 1–10.

Putri, M. S, D. & Z. (2017). Hubungan Kontrol Diri dengan Perilaku Membolos Siswa. KONSELOR, 6(1), 1–5.

Putri, M.A., Neviyarni, Ahmad, R., & Syukur, Y. (2018). Accountability of Guidence and Counseling School. Enlighten. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 1(2), 108–117.

Putri, Y., Afrizal., S., & Ifdil. (2016). Self Regulated Learning Siswa dilihat dari Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(1), 98–102.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Tohirin. (2007). Bimbingan Konseling di Sekolah dan Madrasah. Jakarta: Raja Gravindo Persada.

Viqri, N,. Z, Ifdil, Yusri,. & Frischa M, Y. (2020). Profil Kebermaknaan Hidup Siswa Membolos. Jurnal Aplikasi IPTEK Indonesia, 4(2), 126–135.

Yulianthi, H, dkk. (2012). Faktor penyebab siswa membolos. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling FIP UNJ.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24036/00362kons2021
10.24036/00362kons2021

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 85 times
PDF : 52 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.